Wednesday, 15 October 2014

The Strange Case of Dr.Bendi and the fuel-less uphill train. Part the first, of infinite. (The practical of creation of energy)

video
See my little crossbows


Firing in a row

And each one pulls the next one's string

So on and on they go



Dr.B:- You appear to have resurrected -



Dr.B:- They appear to require a 'hint'. It has been 2 years -



Dr.B:- Is that the right word for QED? -



Dr.B:- They'll ask for QED-er, believe me -



Dr.B:- Perhaps you shouldn't write in metaphor -



Dr.B:- I can make metaphor real -



Dr.B:- Try the re-establishment of Paradise Lost -



Dr.B:- Indeed. Nawrte, do you often see fuel-less trains rolling uphill? Getting less tired? And not stopping at the top? -



Dr.B:- If I ever did, I would consult my metaphysician -



Dr.B:- No, I don't believe you would. I think you'd post-hoc an automated response instead -



Dr.B:- Wel, if you can read my mind -



Dr.B:- It's not as well written as you think. In fact it is. There are better authors -



Dr.B:- What shape am I thinking of? -



Dr.B:- A circle. -



Dr.B:- Wrong! It was a mobiusdodecahedron -



Dr.B:- Yes wel, it doesn't work with schizophrenics. Before that, you were thinking equalbutopposite means there's a force the other way that will stop it. As if there wasn't a 3rd way -



Dr.B:- Actually I was thinking that there is no life in the universe, only naturally occurring machinery, some with stop-go animated virtual selves. That, and section 3 of the mental health act -



Dr.B:- Don't worry until you see two doctors at the same time -



Dr.B:- ?!



Dr.B:- Have you ever noticed, humans think in 2D. In 1 plane. In cross-section? Thus the syntax of sentences. Thus the 2 side equation. Thus all the false projections of fundamental physics. -



Dr.B:- It's as if thought is ultimately binary -



Dr.B:- And all extant philosophical quandaries merely binary propositions in search of fractional truth -



Dr.B:- Just do the train thing -



Dr.B:- We remember that, after a mere few millennia, Mr.Halbach noticed you could augment all on one side. Of one plane -



Dr.B:- I'll take your word for it -



Dr.B:- It's not a secret. Any force can be fabricated via constructive/destructive interference. Apart from infinite. -



Dr.B:- Hurry up, I'm getting bored -



Dr.B:- Wel, like a human, he forgot a dimension. There is in and out as well. I have merely augmented 'relative net right in cross-section'. >1 pushes fore-and-out vs 1 push back. And >1>1. A 3D equation, repeatedly solved in realtime, calcs by reality. I think you'll find that so -



Dr.B:- So each array augments the next? Unlike the destructive interference one may be amused by on the ninternet? It augments, it doesn't cancel to balance -



Dr.B:- Perceptional delusions are forgiveable. Except when pointed out. Anyone who can see segmentation in a rainbow, can see it can't be there. The wavelengths spread on a perfectly smooth gradient, yet discrete segments flip in the mind. There are no lines in reality -



Dr.B:- A projection of the self-delusion -



Dr.B:- The image of God indeed. Bees have this too, and that is why flowers are pretty -



Dr.B:- So it's merely a repeating asymmetry in cross-section? A trick of geometry, simple enough for a planet to understand? -



Dr.B:- I wonder why -



Dr.B:- You don't. Why are you talking to yourself btw? -



Dr.B:- Peer review is unavailable to genius.

4 comments:

  1. Nice to see you still kicking, Dr B.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually always relative net equal opposite. The correct answer is much prettier.

    ReplyDelete