The Solipsist forgets himself, the sceptic can't be sure. The paralogician proves nothing, can make no statement. The paranormal is permitted, only absent. The paraconsistent is not permitted. The physics shall be correct at the levels of self. The time orderings, unless otherwise stated, shall be as perceived during the self delusion, for greater synchrony between writer and reader.
We shall not journey further than death. We shall not go to nothing. We shall not go to minus nothing. Death is quite sufficient, I'm sure you will agree. We shall resurrect later, in good time, as sure as day follows night. In fact, with precisely the same probability, and thus, precisely as factually.
We shall see why this matters. We shall see why indistinguishable from alive, shall not remain so. We shall see the caution required as custodians of the fifth estate, for we are our own jailors.
We shall now see how to unravel persistence of envision. Awake.
Thus spoke Bendithustra
REM:- ffs get on with it. Correct exposition requires no caveats.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A celebration, and if read one after another, a feast...He presents his rigorous argument sentence after poetic sentence. Glorious. Yes and, sybaritic.
ReplyDelete1=-1
ReplyDeletehttp://mathworld.wolfram.com/ComplexNumberParadox.html
The paralogician proves nothing...is everything. One as relational proposition is only proved in opposition. Pick a card, any card. Distinction is predestined but arbitrary.
ReplyDeleteCaveat empty.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile, in the arbitrary world of distinctions, the clock ticks. Is it time yet?
ReplyDeleteTo speak without talking is contra diction.
Like two generals exchanging communications for the attack, the exchange of symbols may be infinite but shall never be confirmatory.
Keep checking the dictionary for relational exposition. You'll find no meaning there.
Mae hi'n siarad trwy ei het. A cocked one.
A Priest well worth listening to... http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/logically-speaking/
ReplyDelete